• HOME
  • Publications
  • BLOG
  • English Phonetics and Phonology
  • The English Pronouncing Dictionary
  • RESOURCES
  Peter Roach

Estuary English: it just keeps rollin' along

23/12/2021

3 Comments

 
I recently had a look at the Wikipedia article on Estuary English, having ignored it for a long time. It’s a topic I keep away from, mainly because so many people pontificate on it, whether they know anything about phonetics or not.  There are quite  a lot of things that seem to me to need changing.

The lead section (the opening paragraph) contains a “definition” of EE by John Wells. The quote comes from a web document called www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/estuary/ee-faqs-jcw.htm While the statement that EE is "Standard English spoken with the accent of the southeast of England" might serve as a rough pointer to what is being talked about, it does not seem to me to be what you could call a definition. 

[Note:  I have now rewritten most of the "Features" section of the article referred to below, so most of my criticisms of that section no longer apply]

The main part of the EE article is called “Features”, and is one of those “laundry list” bits of writing that you get when lots of different people add in their three-pennyworth. Some claims are dubious, some almost certainly wrong, and far too many are based on a single source (Joanna Przedlacka’s 2001 study, worthy though that is).

---------
[I have now removed the material referred to below]
I will quote one case that strikes me as egregious. The “Features” section quotes Ken Lodge’s 2009 book A Critical Introduction to Phonetics as stating that “Estuary /əʊ/ may be pronounced [ɑːɪ̯̈] or [ɑːʏ̯̈], with the first element somewhat lengthened and much more open than in RP and the second element being near-close central, with or without lip rounding.” In addition, a vowel diagram purporting to be from Lodge’s book (p. 175) is reproduced showing the direction of travel for this diphthong. This doesn’t correspond to the diagram in the Lodge reference, and I wonder if the quotation is from somewhere else. To begin with, Lodge is not talking about (and doesn’t mention) Estuary English - he is, rather, talking about possible Australian influence on British English vowels. In his 2009 book, he says that the alternative vowel glide corresponding to RP  /əʊ/ is [ɑəᵻ] or [ɑəʏ]; the diagram shows the former.
----------
​
I won’t go into all the faults with the Features here. Some statements I find hard to believe, such as the claim that some Essex speakers have a clear [l] in ‘pull’. There is surprisingly little about glottalization of /p,t,k,tʃ/ and glottal replacement of /t/. To me the presence of intervocalic glottal stop for /t/ (e.g. ‘getting better’ as [ɡeʔɪŋ beʔə]) is one of the most salient characteristics of this accent, yet this article only mentions replacement of /t/ when it occurs pre-pausally and post-consonantally (the one example given is ‘can’t’ [kɑ:nʔ]).

The “Features” section contains two recorded examples, one of Ricky Gervais and one of Russell Brand. While these are good clear recordings, there is nothing in the text to indicate who has judged these two to be speakers of EE. Compare the article on RP, where the list of RP speakers has a citation to back up each claim.
​
To end the article, someone has added a section called Traditional Rural Estuary English which is about old Kentish and Essex accents. Looking at the history of recent edits this used to be very much longer but most of it has been moved to another article. What is left seems to me to shed little or no light on the present-day nature of EE and I think the article would be better if it was removed.
3 Comments
Sidney Wood link
19/1/2022 06:22:04 pm

A belated comment. Estuary English is just one more version of non-regional RP versus regional accents. Rosewarne referred to Victorian sound changes in Kent and Essex without giving details. After studying the Survey of English dialects for Kent, I distinguished the following: (1) FACE, PRICE and GOAT were the earliest (spreading to 70-100% of Kent by the 1880s); (2) STRUT, TRAP, and THOUGHT starting middle century (spreading to 60-75% of the county by the 1880s; (3) Rhoticity, MOUTH and LOT starting late in the century (spreading to 25-50% of the county by the 1890s).The last change was retraction of BATH to open back, 0% by the 1890s in Kent, appearing in 1900-1910. All these changes had spread to the whole of Kent by the 1940s, and was already spreading out to the Home Counties. So the expression Estuary English was probably an anachronism after 1900. If I may add a personal note, my grandfather was born in the 1880s and would have acquired all but the last few of these sound changes. My parents were born in 1900-1910 and had acquired all of them, as I had too 30 years later.

This accent has now spread all over southeastern England, and is continuing westwards, a regional accent of SBE. Wells (1982 vol 2) distinguished four variants of SBE, East Anglian, Home Counties, London and Western, finding little to report on Home Counties SBE, a measure of the little interest that researchers had taken in "EE", "Home Counties" or "Southeastern". That has changed now (for example Jansen & Amos, 2020, English in the South of England. Special issue of English Today 36).

Reply
Peter
19/1/2022 06:27:50 pm

Thanks for the comment., which places the last section of the WP article in a much clearer historical context.

Reply
Sidney Wood link
21/1/2022 01:58:15 pm

A further comment, this time on your defining quote from Wells. I query the use of 'standard' in this context. My definition of EE (a local 19th century accent appearing along the shores of the Thames Estuary that subsequently spread throughout the home counties) included everyone, wherever they might be on the regional sociolect scale, Defining accent standards is a separate issue. My collection of EE recordings (or regional Home Counties SBE) includes seamen (a bargee, a fisherman), a dentist, professors, and an aristocrat, each representing a location on the regional sociolect scale. Defining EE as 'standard southeasterrn SBE' would exclude non-standard speech of millions of speakers from dialect study.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    A blog that discusses problems in Wikipedia's coverage of Phonetics

    Peter Roach

    Emeritus Professor of Phonetics,
    ​University of Reading, UK

    uArchives

    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    September 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    March 2019
    April 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    July 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    November 2016
    September 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.