• HOME
  • Publications
  • BLOG
  • English Phonetics and Phonology
  • RESOURCES
  • The English Pronouncing Dictionary
  • Peter's Old Cars
  Peter Roach

The TH thing

1/6/2016

0 Comments

 
​​There is a Wikipedia article called ‘Pronunciation of English <th>’, and as you would expect it’s concerned with the phonemes /θ/ and /ð/. It actually covers much more than simple pronunciation, with quite a lot of information about the historical origins of these phonemes. As some WP editors have noted, the article is rather short of references. Unfortunately it also contains some dubious material that will need correcting.
The opening statement of the section General Description (opening statements are always a tricky moment) says “In standard English, the phonetic realization of the dental fricative phonemes shows less variation than for many other English consonants”. Leaving aside the grammar of this sentence, it makes a practically unverifiable claim – there is no scientific method that I know of for comparing how much variability there is in the realizations of a given consonant phoneme in comparison with those of other phonemes. In WP, if you make a sweeping claim like this, you are supposed to give a reference for it.
The article continues “Both [/θ/ and /ð/] are pronounced either interdentally, with the blade of the tongue resting against the lower part of the back of the upper teeth and the tip protruding slightly or alternatively with the tip of the tongue against the back of the upper teeth. The interdental position might also be described as "apico-" or "lamino-dental". This section has strong echoes of the discussion of /θ/ and /ð/ by Ladefoged and Maddieson in Sounds of the World’s Languages (pp 143-4), but seems to have misunderstood what they wrote. They (L&M) say that /θ/ and /ð/ may be articulated either with the tip of the tongue behind the upper front teeth or with the tongue-tip protruded between the upper and lower front teeth. They say that the latter (interdental) articulation must be laminal, whereas the articulation with the tongue touching the upper front teeth (dental) may be apical or laminal. (See their illustration below)
Picture
​A bit lower down we get another dubious claim:  “…/θ/ is more strongly aspirated than /ð/, as can be demonstrated by holding a hand a few centimeters in front of the mouth and noticing the differing force of the puff of air created by the articulatory process”. This is the old test for detecting aspiration of plosives (traditionally with the aid of a candle flame), and it doesn’t even work for those. There is no aspiration (as normally defined) of /θ/, and its airflow is weak.
0 Comments

    A blog that discusses problems in Wikipedia's coverage of Phonetics

    Peter Roach

    Emeritus Professor of Phonetics

    Archives

    April 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    July 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    November 2016
    September 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Powered by
✕